{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;} {\f36\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}Arial Black;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;} {\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;} {\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f47\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f48\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f50\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;}{\f51\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;} {\f52\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f53\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f54\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f55\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);}{\f397\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial Black CE;} {\f398\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Black Cyr;}{\f400\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Black Greek;}{\f401\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Black Tur;}{\f404\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Black Baltic;}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{ \s1\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\outlinelevel0\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tblind0\tblindtype3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 header;}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}{ \s18\ql \li2880\ri0\widctlpar\phpg\posxc\posyb\absh-1980\absw7920\dxfrtext180\dfrmtxtx180\dfrmtxty0\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin2880\itap0 \b\f36\fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext18 envelope address;}{ \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 Body Text;}{\*\cs20 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 Hyperlink;}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid8723879\rsid9505268} {\*\generator Microsoft Word 10.0.6838;}{\info{\title 12 Versailles St}{\author Hugh Barr}{\operator peter}{\creatim\yr2008\mo4\dy16\hr17\min47}{\revtim\yr2008\mo4\dy16\hr17\min47}{\printim\yr2008\mo4\dy14\hr21\min47}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages3} {\nofwords1559}{\nofchars8890}{\*\company }{\nofcharsws10429}{\vern16393}{\*\password 00000000}}{\*\xmlnstbl }\paperw11907\paperh16840\margl1247\margr1247\margt1134\margb1134\gutter0 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\grfdocevents0\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow1\dgvshow0 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale75\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\bdrrlswsix\nolnhtadjtbl\oldas\rsidroot8723879 \fet0{\*\wgrffmtfilter 013f}{\*\template C:\\Documents and Settings\\H Barr\\Application Data\\Microsoft\\Templates\\Hugh.dot}\sectd \linex0\footery851\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\headerr \pard\plain \s15\qr \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst { \i\fs16\insrsid9505268 FILENAME \\* MERGEFORMAT }}{\fldrslt {\i\fs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid9505268 Walking Access Bill-Comments Hugh Barr 14Apr08}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\i\fs16\insrsid9505268 \par }}{\footerr \pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\i\f1\insrsid9505268 Hugh Barr\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst { \cs17\i\f1\insrsid9505268 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs17\i\f1\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid9505268 1}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\cs17\i\f1\insrsid9505268 \tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\i\f1\insrsid9505268 DATE }}{\fldrslt { \cs17\i\f1\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid9505268 16/04/2008}}}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\i\f1\insrsid9505268 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta ..}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta ..}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta ..}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\f36\fs38\cf6\insrsid9505268 Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations}{\f36\fs38\insrsid9505268 \par }{\b\f36\fs36\cf6\insrsid9505268 of New Zealand Inc \par }\pard \qr \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 P O Box 1876 Wellington \par Tel&Fax +64 4 934 2244 \par }{\field{\*\fldinst {\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 HYPERLINK "mailto:hugh@infosmart.co.nz" }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid8723879 {\*\datafield 00d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000017000000150000006800750067006800400069006e0066006f0073006d006100720074002e0063006f002e006e007a000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b380000006d00610069006c0074006f003a006800750067006800400069006e0066006f0073006d00 6100720074002e0063006f002e006e007a00000000}}}{\fldrslt {\cs20\b\f1\fs22\ul\cf2\insrsid9505268 hugh@infosmart.co.nz}}}\sectd \linex0\footery851\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 15 April 2008 \par \par }\pard\plain \s1\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\outlinelevel0\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f1\fs28\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9505268 Walking Access Bill - designed to reduce and limit public access. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 Summary}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : The Bill lets down the public\rquote s desire for better public access provision, being }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 focussed primarily on replacing public roads, the strongest form of access, with one of the least satisfactory forms of public access namely Walkways}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . Walkways across private land hardly exist, and in any case are adequately looked after by DOC. Walkways can be readily closed, and deny access to people with dogs, recreational firearms, cyclists, horse-riders, all of whom can use formed or unformed public roads, the no rmal means of access. \par \par This Bill sets up a Walking Access Commission focussed primarily on Walkways. It will }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 restrict and downgrade public access to the countryside}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . The Bill is bad in many areas. It will be difficult to amend to be acceptable. A similar Walkways Commission was tried between 1975 and 1990. It was ineffective, and was abolished by the fourth Labour Government. Walkways are not the answer to better public access to the countryside, coasts water bodies etc. Stronger access mechanisms are ess ential. \par \par The Bill promotes the }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 Commission providing walkways across public conservation land. But this is and should remain DOC\rquote s responsibility. There is no need for this small Crown agency to be saddled with providing \'93 Walkways\'94}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . DOC has been funded $349 million over ten years to build and maintain these and other facilities. The Walkways system probably costs DOC some $1 million a year to maintain. \par \par The Commission }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 also can replace the guaranteed public access provided by unformed public roads by changing them to insecure limited access Walkways}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . This is a major downgrading of public access through private land. \par \par This Bill has been developed under Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). The Bill\rquote s unsatisfactory nature comes partly from a major conflict with MAF\rquote s purpose. MAF is there to serve rural landowners, not recreational users. If the Access Commission is to have any neutrality and integrity it must not be in MAF, as currently proposed. LINZ with a changed brief, and the Minister of Lands are a much more appropriate home, given the Minister of Lands is often the decision maker on protection of access on legal roads, marginal strips etc. \par \par There is no guarantee the Board of the Commission will have any recreational representatives. Recreational pr ofessionals have been excluded from the two Acland panels. To be workable, at least three of the Board members should recreationists with public access knowledge. \par \par Including the Government Super Fund (Clauses 12-14) shows the Bill is about providing jobs for the boys in MAF as it is with public access. These admin matters have no place in the Bill. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs24\insrsid9505268 More detailed comments}{\f1\fs24\insrsid9505268 : \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 1 Bill severely downgraded in terms of providing public access, or showing Access \'93leadership\'94}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par This is clear from page 2 first sentence: \'93The Bill re-enacts in large measure the provisions of the NZ Walkways Act 1990.\'94 \par \par The Commission should not be weighed down with administering walkways, when they are adequately looked after the Department of Conservation. A range of recreational views and ideas also need to be guaranteed a place on the Commission\rquote s Board, if it is to have any credibility. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 2 Walkways aren\rquote t needed \endash they are a very unsatisfactory type of access}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par Prior to 1990 there was a Walkways Commission (WC), established in 1975, composed primarily of farming and rural landowner interests, for providing public walkw ays across private, usually rural, land. The legislation was administered by Lands and Survey Department, and was transferred to DOC in 1987. The Walkways Commission was an absolute failure. It was abolished by the 4}{\f1\fs22\super\insrsid9505268 th}{ \f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 Labour Government in 1990, by Geoffrey Palmer\rquote s Quango Hunt. Responsibilities were then passed to DOC, where they now are. \par \par In its 15 years the WC had set up only 1400 km of Walkways. Some 90% of these were on Public Conservation Land, where the public can go freely anyway. This was an easy a nd costless but pointless option. Many were already tracks used by the public, simply renamed Walkways. \par \par Only 10% of the Km were across private land, and very few of these were registered, ie were permanent. Most rural landowners did not want a permanent public Walkway on their title. It was an encumbrance significantly lowering their property\rquote s value. \par \par As anyone agreeing to a Walkway across their property gets no compensation, ie it is a cheap deal for the Crown, and depends on the generosity of the land owner, this is understandable. Walkways should not be used to downgrade already existing public access. \par \par Walkways are one of the least satisfactory types of public access across private land. They can be closed for \'93lambing\'94 or \'93fire risk\'94 on the owner\rquote s s ay so. For example the controversial walkway up Mt Hikurangi on the East Coast can be closed arbitrarily for Maori cultural purposes for 14 days/year, and for lambing and farm management for 21 consecutive days a year, and for up to 50 days/year in total. There is no certainty one will be able to walk it when one gets there. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 3 Better methods of public access across private land \endash legal roads and Tenure Review}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9505268 The most secure form of public access is by legal roads. These allow the public on a bicycle, wit h a dog or gun, on a horse etc to pass and repass. The Acland Panel proposed that these be identified on the ground, and used more for public access to the countryside. The Acland Panel identified 45,000 km of unformed legal roads as being potentially ava ilable to enhance public access. This Bill aims to destroy the unformed public road system, by turning such general access-ways into these highly restricted Walkways. \par \par Public access in South Island Tenure Review is almost never provided by NZ Walkways, beca use of their uncertainty. Nor can the public cycle, take a dog, or take a firearm on them. They are a very restricted type of access, quite unsuited for providing adequate public access to the countryside, or to coasts, rivers, lakes or public conservatio n land. One sees the hand of the anti-access faction, namely Federated Farmers. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 4 Commission should not be under MAF}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par A major conflict of interest, apparent from the start of this process, is having the Access Commission in MAF. MAF\rquote s role is to serve rural landholders. Because of this it usually has an antagonistic attitude to both the rural and urban public \rquote s access needs. This conflict of interest is apparent in the farcical way this Access Commissioner Bill has been hijacked away from influence by recre ational users. Parliament must resolve this major conflict of interest by placing the Commission under a more neutral department eg LINZ and the Minister of Lands. \par \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9505268 Under MAF, recreational user representatives were largely excluded from the Acland Access P anels, as were their concerns and ideas from the Panel\rquote s proposals. Landholders and rural representatives, and their views have dominated. This sidelining of legitimate recreational access concerns led to the only recreational professional on the second Ac land Panel, Bryce Johnson, being forced to come up with a minority report. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par 5 Walkways over public land}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : As discussed above, these aren\rquote t attractive forms of access. On public land they would restrict current access ie the public\rquote s use of tracks on Public Conservation Land (PCL) to only that subsection of the public that is permitted to use walkways ie to exclude people with a gun or dog, on a cycle or horse, who can use unformed legal roads. Locking public stakeholder groups out of PCL should not be an aim of this Bill. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 6 Commission should have a wider role on public Access generally}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : Walking access is only part of the major issues recreational users have with access.. This was clearly put and recognised in Acland Access discussions. However, it is clear ly excluded in the Bill (Clause 3). This sidelines the Commission to minimal access usefulness. \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par 7 Recreational users need assured representatives on the board}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par Given the sidelining of recreational representatives in the Acland Panel, it is essential to have legitimate recreational representatives on the Commission Board. Otherwise the Commission should have its name changed to the Anti Walking Access Landholders Comm ission. \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par 8 Betrayal of the recreational public}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par This Bill makes Public Access a farce, favouring Federated Farmers, the most vociferous anti-recreational access lobbyists. The issue now is can Labour find the strength to put the Commission back on track t o be a guardian of public access. This looks improbable. \par \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 9 Need to re-focus and rewrite this Bill}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : There is a lot wrong with this Bill from almost every recreational access viewpoint. To be acceptable, the following changes must be made: \par \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid9505268 1 Leave Walkways with DOC, and don\rquote t rewrite the 1990 Walkways Act}{ \insrsid9505268 into this legislation. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 2 Prohibit Walkways across Public Conservation Land}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 .. Walkways are aimed at provision of low quality public access across private land, based on the generosity of the landowner. \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 3 Prohibit walkways replacing legal roads and downgrading them to walkway status}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . \par 4 Ensure that the Public Access Commissioner }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 can consider access issues other than just walking}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 without a gun or a dog. \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 5 Site the Commission in a department other than MAF or DOC, }{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 reporting to a}{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 Minister other than MAF, Rural Affairs }{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 (the present Minister)}{ \b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 or DOC}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . Eg LINZ and Min of Lands \par 6 Ensure at }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 least three members of the Board are nominated by outdoor recreational interests}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 . \par \par }{\b\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 10 Conclusion}{\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 : \par }\pard\plain \s19\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f1\fs22\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9505268 Without all six of these change s there is no advantage to having this Bill passed. It is better to continue with the present unsatisfactory situation, than to greatly downgrade the public\rquote s access rights with the major detrimental changes proposed in this Bill. Concentrating on replacing sure and secure forms of public access, such as legal roads, with much less secure and certain Walkways is unacceptable to the recreational community. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\nooverflow\faroman\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par There is also no point in a Board, tasked with improving public access, being almost wholly stacked with rural landowner advocates, set on reducing and controlling public access to the countryside. \par \par Best Regards \par \par \par Hugh Barr 04 934 2244 }{\field{\*\fldinst {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 HYPERLINK "mailto:hugh@infosmart.co.nz" }{\f1\fs22\insrsid8723879 {\*\datafield 00d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000017000000150000006800750067006800400069006e0066006f0073006d006100720074002e0063006f002e006e007a000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b500000006d00610069006c0074006f003a006800750067006800400069006e0066006f0073006d00 6100720074002e0063006f002e006e007a000000795881f43b1d7f48af2c825dc485276300000000a5ab000000}}}{\fldrslt {\cs20\f1\fs22\ul\cf2\insrsid9505268 hugh@infosmart.co.nz}}}\sectd \linex0\footery851\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\f1\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par \par \par \par }{\fs22\insrsid9505268 \par }}